粮油食品科技

1. 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)收录期刊
2. 2023年版《中文核心期刊要目总览》收录期刊
3. 中国科技核心期刊
4. CACJ中国应用型核心期刊
5. 中国农林核心期刊
6. 科创中国“科技期刊双语传播工程”入选期刊
7. “中国精品期刊展”入选期刊
8. 荷兰Elsevier-Scopus数据库收录期刊
9. 瑞典DOAJ(开放存取期刊目录)收录期刊
10. 美国EBSCO学术数据库收录期刊
11. 美国《化学文摘》(CA)收录期刊
12. 英国《食品科技文摘》(FSTA)收录期刊
13. 英国国际应用生物科学中心(CABI)数据库收录期刊
14. 日本科学技术振兴机构中国文献数据库(JSTChina)收录期刊
15. 美国《乌利希国际期刊指南》(UPD)收录期刊
16. OA开放获取典范期刊

我国食品标准中产品等级设立的研究与思考
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Research and Thinking on the Establishment of Product Grade in Food Standard in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在食品等消费品中建立健全质量分级标准体系,有利于推动产品标准升级。虽然,我国在各细分领域食品国家标准和行业标准中一些产品标准进行了等级设立,但对等级设立情况尚没有系统的研究。对白酒、茶叶、粮油、酿酒、食用菌、水产、调味品、盐业、制糖和质量通则等领域64项国家标准和105项行业标准涉及的222种产品的中等级设立数量、名称、主要分级指标进行研究与分析。222项产品中设立等级数量从2个级别到7个级别不等,其中设立等级主要集中在3个级别和2个级别,最多设立7个级别。各标准中等级名称设立类型较多,以纯数字为等级名称情况最为常见。产品设立等级指标绝大部分涵盖了感官品质,其中很多产品中设立等级指标只以感官品质进行等级划分。同时,有一部分标准中设立等级指标没有采用感官品质而只是采用理化指标,而大部分产品是两类指标均采用。这些等级设立,很好地引导和促进了食品高质量发展。然而,也存在名称设立适用性不高和指标特征性不充分等问题。为了更好促进我国食品标准中产品等级设立,提出了建立其命名指南,鼓励更多使用特征营养和主要原辅料投料量等指标思考和建议。

    Abstract:

    The establishment of a sound quality classification standard system in consumer goods, such as food, is conducive to promoting the upgrading of product standards. Although the grade establishment has been incorporated within certain product standards in both national and industrial food standards in a variety of segments, no systematic study on grade establishment has yet been conducted. The present study is an analysis of the establishment of medium grades for 222 products involved in 64 national and 105 industry standards, including liquor, tea, grains and oils, brewing, edible fungi, aquatic products, spices, salt, sugar and general rules of quality. The number of levels set in 222 products ranged from 2 to 7, with the most established grades being 2 and 3. There are many types of grade names in each standard, and it is most common to use all numbers as grade names. The majority of grade indexes established in the products encompass organoleptic qualities, with numerous products being graded exclusively on the basis of organoleptic attributes. At the same time, certain standards eschew the use of organoleptic quality, employing solely physical and chemical indicators. Conversely, the preponderance of products utilises both types of indicators.. The establishment of these grades has effectively guided and promoted the high-quality development of food products. Nevertheless, challenges persist, including the suboptimal applicability of name establishment and the inadequate characterisation of indicators. This study aims to propose a set of guidelines for the naming of product grades in China's food standards, with a view to enhancing the establishment of such grades. The study also puts forward recommendations for the greater utilisation of indicators such as characterised nutrition and the amount of major raw and auxiliary ingredients input.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

董一威,屠斌华,孙丽娟,屠振华*.我国食品标准中产品等级设立的研究与思考[J].粮油食品科技,2025,33(3):197-203.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-05-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码